Calls for Papers

13 June 2024

The World and Europe: Diplomatic Transfers, Networks, Representations and Practices

Sixth Conference of the New Diplomatic History Network

Sciences po Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France, 22–24 May 2025

Deadline for proposals: 1st October 2024


The 6th conference of the network for New Diplomatic History, scheduled for the spring of 2025 at Sciences po Aix, will mark the 12th anniversary of the inaugural NDH conference held at Leiden in 2013 ( This event will be dedicated to the study of diplomatic transfers, networks, representations and practices between the World and Europe, but also between Europe and the World. This approach aims to highlight North-South and South-North dimensions of diplomatic practices and actors during the modern and contemporary periods (XVIth – XXIst centuries).

The theme chosen for this conference will gather research dealing with diplomacy as a shared activity. Peoples involved in diplomacy are constantly dependent on their interlocutors, their practices, their rhythms and their language. They feed off the experiences they encounter, seeking to adapt their negotiating style to the world’s political, social, psychological and technological evolutions, with the aim of best defending their country’s interests. While the idea is well establish that diplomatic actors in the South were able to draw inspiration from the practices of the North to assert themselves on the international scene at the turning point of the decolonization process, historiography has not only shown that transnational North-South, South-South and South-North transnational influences were already at work before the mid- twentieth century, but also that after the decolonizations, the countries of the North had no choice but to adapt to the realities and experiences of the South in order to have a say in post-colonial international relations.

The goal of this 6th conference will be to continue the efforts of previous meetings to broaden the scope of new diplomatic history. It welcomes global perspectives originating from outside the Euro-American sphere, to explore the inter-cultural dimensions of diplomatic contacts across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and how diplomatic norms have been adapted to context-specific settings and practices.

The conference thus welcomes proposals for panels or contributions on, but not limited to, the following subjects:

. North-South Diplomatic networks

. Transfers of diplomatic norms, practices and languages

. Circulations of diplomatic and para-diplomatic personnel

. Evolutions and functioning of diplomatic institutions

. Diaspora diplomacy

. Consular networks

. Diplomatic corps and diplomatic milieus

These are meant as broad categories, and the conference will be opened to a variety of approaches. In doubt, please contact the organisers to check whether the subject you have in mind would fit.

The conference will be organised on site, but using a hybrid format. The goal is to have as many participants as possible on site, but presenters will also be able to participate remotely, using the technical possibilities offered by Sciences po Aix. Taking this into account, I would like to ask you to mention in your proposal if you intend to participate remotely, and the reasons for doing so. Entire panels can be organised remotely, if all the participants agree.

Proposals for single contributions or panels should be sent to the following address:, before October 1st 2024.

The organisers would be grateful if you could advertise the conference via your own networks. While advertising on social media, please use the conference’s tag #NDH6Aix2025. On Twitter, remember to tag the NDH-network: @NDH_Network

Single proposals should be no more than 300 words, panel proposals no more than 500 words. The names of the participants and their contacts should be included in the proposal. For panel proposals, the panel organiser’s name should be clearly marked, as well as the panel’s discussant.

Abstracts will be published online ahead of the conference, and participants will be asked to provide their panel’s discussant with a written version of their presentation to serve as a basis for comments.

Information about Aix-en-Provence and Sciences po Aix may be found here:


3 December 2023

International Friendship within and beyond the Iron Curtain

Proposal submission deadline: 20 January 2024

18–19 April 2024, Institute of Contemporary History Ljubljana


18 October 2023

Culture & International History VII:  Uncertain Boundaries in International History

deadline for abstracts: 15 November 2023

12–14 December 2024, Freie Universität Berlin

CIH VII_Call for Papers


18 June 2023

Translation in Early Modern Diplomacies: Between Tradition and Innovation

deadline for abstracts: 15 September 2023

German Historical Institute, Paris, 14–15 December 2023

CFP Translation in early modern diplomacy


31 May 2023

Informal Spaces and Practices of Diplomacy 1750–1850

deadline for abstracts: 15 July 2023

Oxford Research Centre for the Humanities, 23–27 September 2023

Oxford Conference Call for Papers


26 May 2023

Webinar: Foreign Consulates and Consular Agents in France in the 20th Century

deadline for abstracts: 7 July 2023

Appel à contribution pour la 2e année du webinaire


6 January 2023

Summer school in Socioeconomic Diplomacy and Global Empire Building, 16th-19th Centuries

deadline for abstracts 15 February 2023


13 December 2022

Treaties and Literature
(Diplomatica special issues)
deadline for submissions: 15 February 2023

For two special issues of Diplomatica we invite proposals for essays on (1) the history and culture of diplomatic treaties; and (2) aspects of diplomacy’s relationship to literature. Essays may cover any historical period up to the present-day. The central questions that the special issues pose are:

(1) Treaties

– How and why have diplomatic texts evolved?

– How has their hermeneutics changed over time?

– Are treaties better understood as literary artifacts or as socio-political constructs?

– What can the evolution of treaties tell us about the evolution of diplomacy and the diplomatic profession?

(2) Literature

– How does literary skill manifest itself in diplomatic practice?

– How do diplomatic ‘narratives’ shape actual diplomacy?

– Are there particular diplomatic ‘genres’ and, if so, how are they best understood?

Possible topics include:

– histories and/or literary comparisons of particular treaties;

– case studies of literary diplomats and/or diplomatic works;

– semiotic analyses of particular treaties or other agreements;

– visual, musical, and cinematic depictions of literature in diplomatic contexts.

Please send expressions of interest, or abstracts of 500 words and a brief bio-note to the issue editors, by 15 February 2023. Please quote ‘Treaties’ or ‘Literature’ in the subject line.

Notification of acceptance will be no later than 1 March 2023. If accepted, full essays (of 7000 to 9000 words) will be due by 15 December 2023.

Review-essays and interviews pertinent to the special issue are also very welcome. Please contact the journal editors with any questions.


7 December 2022

Diplomatic Capitals.

Transformations, (De)localizations, Legitimations since 1945

Workshop at the German Historical Institute Paris

6–7 June 2023

Deadline: 15 January 2023

Scientific Committee: Laurence Badel (Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Nicolas Badalassi (Sciences-Po Aix), Anne-Sophie Gijs (UCLouvain), Jürgen Finger (German Historical Institute Paris)

Research on capital cities in the last three decades has been guided largely by a constructivist reading that regards them from a symbolic perspective, and not as sites of actual power. Without detracting from the importance of perceptions and concepts, this workshop will explore the distinctive features of the diplomatic capital with respect to the ‘international capital (city)’ and the ‘global city’.

The diplomatic capital is an analytical concept that was developed on the basis of European experiences (cf. Badel, Revue historique 2022-3, no. 703), and research is needed on its applications and relevance in the context of the restructuring of international relations since 1945. It is defined on the basis of four fonctions: representation, negotiation, codification and deliberation. As the site of international recognition, the diplomatic capital houses not only representative institutions such as embassies, permanent representations and international organizations, but also often less widely known trade or cultural missions, the expressions of a para- or proto-diplomacy, and potentially the precursors of legations or embassies. As a place of negotiations, the diplomatic capital specializes in the codification of the rules of the international game. Finally, since the nineteenth century it has developed a fourth, deliberative function. The diplomatic capital can also be defined as a city that hosts not only regular conferences of non-governmental organizations or congresses of activists demanding changes to the international rules, but other ‘fora’ where diplomatic exchanges may take place. The associated functions have had impacts on both the municipal and national fabric. In this context, even cities with no diplomatic tradition have been able to develop a new role on the international stage. This workshop will explore the logics underlying these processes.

In the last decade, Abu Dhabi became the seat of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) in 2011, and in 2016 the city hosted an international conference on endangered cultural heritage. And when the headquarters of the International Solar Alliance (ISA) were established in Gwal Pahari, Haryana state, India, it became the country’s first diplomatic capital.

While before 1945 such diplomatic capitals were concentrated in the Atlantic world, they have since spread to all continents, not least because this allows decolonized states to participate in the functioning of international relations. The priority of the workshop will be to shed light on how new diplomatic capitals outside Europe, in Africa, Asia and Latin America, established and asserted themselves during and after the Cold War – including in comparison to, and in competition with, European diplomatic capitals both old and new. In addition, we will seek to examine this concept’s analytical potential and suitability to capture the transformations of multilateralism as well as both regional and local spaces after 1945.

Contributions are invited in five thematic areas:

The city and its transformations: For a city to establish itself as a diplomatic capital, sites must be built or repurposed for new diplomatic activities. We will look both at informal sites of negociation (hotels, hospitals, private homes) and buildings that were constructed for international organizations, often following architectural competitions. We will also explore the effects of these new diplomatic sites and uses on existing districts, and the formation of new districts.

Diplomatic (de)localization – (dis)placements and (dis)locations: Contributions in this area will deal with spatial reconfigurations at the national and continental levels as cities take on diplomatic functions. While embassies and international organizations are concentrated in administrative capitals, some cities perform diplomatic functions without being the seat of government agencies: Geneva and Bern represent an archetypal example. The political forms of states – centralized, decentralized or federal – influence the localization of diplomatic functions. We will examine not only the centralization of negotiations, but the role of peripheral sites and the strategies used to re- or delocalize diplomatic activity.

Diplomatic professions: The establishment and consolidation of a diplomatic capital goes hand in hand with the development of specific occupations: interpreters and translators, security guards, encryption specialists, etc. We will pay particular attention to these socio-professional groups. Did the meeting of practices from abroad with local conditions lead to noteworthy changes, cultural hybridizations that altered the rules, habits, protocols or methods of the “diplomatic professions”? Diplomatic capitals are also the sites of education and training in the diplomatic professions, as evidenced by the diplomatic academies in the former socialist states of Europe or in Africa, Latin America and Asia.

Transfer of practices between diplomatic capitals: Has the establishment of diplomatic capitals around the world reproduced or transformed practices that began as commonly accepted customs, and were later codified by international conventions? Were experiences shared between cities, and what were the consequences at either end? Were networks of cities formed in order to facilitate these transfers?

Political representations and legitimacy: To what extent does a city’s status as a diplomatic capital contribute to the construction of its brand image, particularly with respect to new subjects of negotiation (the environment, women’s rights, etc.), and with what impacts both nationally and internationally? What communications and promotional strategies have municipalities, regions/provinces and states developed to boost the image of the host city? What resources and instruments have been used to this end? To what extent have economic and political actors in these cities participated in these promotional efforts?

To encourage new research, contributions focusing on the second half of the 20th century will be given priority. Contributions centred on African and Asian cities are particularly welcome. Proposals are requested from both historians and geographers. The following list of diplomatic capitals identified by the scientific committee is not an exhaustive one: Addis Abeba, Bandung, Bangkok, Barcelona, Belgrade, Berlin, Bonn, Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Havana, Helsinki, London, Mexico City, Montpellier, Munich, Nairobi, Naples, Oslo, Rio de Janeiro, Shanghai, Singapore, Stockholm.

Costs for transport, accommodation in Paris, and meals will be covered by the organizers.

We welcome proposals for presentations (ca. 20 minutes) in German, French or English that explore a case study or discuss an epistemological question. In addition to the abstract of the proposed presentation, proposals should include a review of the source material in order to structure a research network. We expect the submission of a draft presentation about a week before the conference.

Please send your proposal (max. 1000 words) and a short CV by 15 January 2023 to


23 November 2022

Amsterdam University Press is planning a collective publication on “Languages of Diplomacy in Early Modern World” (volume’s editors: Vladislav Rjeoutski, German Historical Institute in Paris, and Gleb Kazakov, Justus Liebig University of Giessen). We are inviting scholars working on the use of languages by early modern diplomats in various settings to submit their paper proposals by December 15. You will find below a short description of the main research question of the volume.

During the early modern period linguistic practices in European diplomacy changed drastically, including the progressive eclipse of Latin, Italian and German as diplomatic languages and the rise of French as a Pan-European medium of diplomacy. While it was not a secret that French was the dominant language of European elites in general during the eighteenth century, we know surprisingly little about the ways in which this cultural trend translated into the major linguistic shift in diplomacy. We seek to take a broader perspective tracking these changes throughout the early modern period (from 1600 till the early 1800s). The goal of this volume is to map out the pace, the mechanisms, the reasons and the limits for changes in the use of languages in early modern diplomacy and to explore the linguistic practices of diplomats as an indicator of wider social, cultural, and political changes. We would like particularly to invite scholars working on concrete cases or adopting a panoramic view to explore the use of languages in diplomatic milieus in Italian states, Great Britain, the Ottoman Empire or the Habsburg monarchy.

We would be glad to receive proposals from interested scholars (title and a short abstract of 200 words), to be sent to the following addresses: Vladislav Rjeoutski (German Historical Institute in Paris),; Gleb Kazakov (Justus Liebig University of Giessen), The articles (between 6000 and 8000 words) are due in April 2023.


22 November 2022

Practices of Public Diplomacy, 1500-2020

Deadline for paper abstracts is January 21, 2023. The conference, “Practices of Public Diplomacy, 1500-2020,” is scheduled to take place in Amsterdam from October 18 to 20, 2023.

For more information, see here.


21 July 2022

Communicating Diplomacy

Global Comparisons of Oral, Written, and Material Early Modern Negotiations

Uppsala, Sweden, 1–2 December 2022

Deadline for proposals, 15 August 2022


5 March 2022

State-Making and Diplomacy in Europe 1050–1500

Sponsored by the Research in Medieval Studies Network

Lisbon, 3–4 November 2022

Deadline for proposals, 15 April 2022


28 February 2022

New Diplomatic History and the State: (Special Issue of Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften).

by Falko Schnicke

The approaches summarised as New Diplomatic History (NDH) represent essential innovations in the history of politics and diplomacy in recent decades. They have changed the way we look at diplomacy historically and have broadened our understanding of diplomacy. For example, the focus on new actors such as non-state or unofficial diplomats raised the question of who can conduct diplomacy. The focus on transnational negotiations raised the question of how national diplomacy is. And the focus on forms of negotiation and diplomatic processes, to name just one more example, raised the question of whether diplomacy can only be measured by results.

The planned thematic issue of the Austrian Journal of Historical Studies (OeZG) aims to take up the potential inherent in the NDH and apply it back to state diplomacy: The basic thesis is that NDH approaches and the analysis of state diplomacy are not mutually exclusive―and that, on the contrary, it would be a shortcut not to apply the enriching and innovative questions of the NDH to state diplomacy as well. Complementing and overlapping the focus on non-state diplomacy, an NDH analysis of state diplomacy promises new insights into the functioning of diplomatic action as a whole. This should contribute to a critical history of state diplomacy.

To this end, it is helpful to feed the cultural history of politics and the cultural history of the political, which have received too little attention so far, into the discussion on the NDH. This is also a movement in two directions because the cultural history of the political also knows under-explored areas. It has often focused on domestic politics and could, therefore, benefit from an opening to foreign politics.

The contributions planned so far take up these perspectives and discuss the potentials of the NDH for contexts of state diplomacy using the example of new places (airports), new actors (animals) and new perspectives (diplomatic knowledge).

The planned issue of the OeZG is scheduled to appear in 2023. For this purpose, further substantial abstracts for essays in German or English (respective mother tongue) are requested by 31 March 2022 to, discussing the question of the potential of the NDH for the analysis of state diplomacy based on concrete case studies. Abstracts should be no longer than 500 words and include the paper’s title, source material and a short CV of the authors (max. 1 page) in one PDF. The length of the finished contributions is max. 60,000 characters. They must be submitted by 01 November 2022 to allow for external peer review by the OeZG


10 January 2022

International History and Diplomacy, Liverpool John Moores University,

Theme: human rights and humanitarianism.

13 May 2022.

Deadline for proposals:  4 March 2022.


3 January 2022

CFP: Diplomacy situated: settings, personas, practices. Fifth Conference of the New Diplomatic History Network.

University of Turku, Finland, 25th-27th May 2023

Deadline for proposals: 1st August 2022


The 5th conference of the network for New Diplomatic History, scheduled for the spring of 2023 at the University of Turku, will mark the 10th anniversary of the inaugural NDH conference held at Leiden in 2013 ( This event will be dedicated to the study of ‘situated diplomacy’. We will consider the settings in which and through which diplomacy has been incarnated throughout history, involving sites (real, virtual, fictional), practices, and personas. Each meeting organised by the network has demonstrated the rich breadth and depth of the study of diplomacy across disciplines and periodisations, and NDH5Turku2023 aims to continue this trend.

The theme chosen for this conference will gather research dealing with diplomacy as a rooted, situated activity. Diplomacy and diplomats operate in places, such as embassies to ministries, but also in social and cultural milieus, in traditions, in social norms and legal rules. They develop practices that form the organizational principles of their fluid activities. These elements form a stage-setting that plays an important part in the diplomatic process. Participants to the conference are asked to consider these elements, their role in diplomacy, their evolution, and the state of research today. These elements will be explored further by three keynote presentations.

The goal of this 5th conference will also be to continue the efforts of previous meetings to broaden the scope of new diplomatic history. It welcomes global perspectives originating from outside the Euro-American sphere, to explore the inter-cultural dimensions of diplomatic contacts across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and how diplomatic norms have been adapted to context-specific settings and practices.

The conference thus welcomes proposals for panels or contributions on, but not limited to, the following subjects:

. Diplomatic places and sites, diplomatic architecture

. Situated diplomatic norms and practices

. Fictional, virtual diplomatic settings

. Diplomatic and para-diplomatic personnel

. Evolutions and functioning of diplomatic institutions

. Diaspora diplomacy

. Consular networks

. Diplomatic corps and diplomatic milieus

These are meant as broad categories, and the conference will be opened to a variety of approaches. In doubt, please contact the organisers to check whether the subject you have in mind would fit.

The conference will also welcome a round table of diplomatic protagonists organized in cooperation with the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and dealing with the diplomacy of small states. It will conclude with a seminar on the network’s journal, Diplomatica, and another one on publishing opportunities for studies in diplomacy – including publishing opportunities in other languages than English.

The conference will be organised on site, but using a hybrid format. The goal is to have as many participants as possible on site, but presenters will also be able to participate remotely, using the technical possibilities offered by the University of Turku. Taking this into account, I would like to ask you to mention in your proposal if you intend to participate remotely, and the reasons for doing so. Entire panels can be organised remotely, if all the participants agree.

Proposals for single contributions or panels should be sent to the following address:, before August 1st 2022.

The organisers would be grateful if you could advertise the conference via your own networks. While advertising on social media, please use the conference’s tag #NDH5Turku2023. On Twitter, remember to tag the NDH-network: @NDH_Network

Single proposals should be no more than 300 words, panel proposals no more than 500 words. The names of the participants and their contacts should be included in the proposal. For panel proposals, the panel organiser’s name should be clearly marked, as well as the panel’s discussant.

Abstracts will be published online ahead of the conference, and participants will be asked to provide their panel’s discussant with a written version of their presentation to serve as a basis for comments.

Information about Turku and the university may be found here:

4 December 2021
CfP – Nordic Jurists and Legal Internationalism 1880s-1970s
Workshops: 12-14 September 2022 & 26-28 January 2023, Copenhagen and Stockholm
Proposals for papers should be 300-400 words in length, together with a short biography of the author/s and should be sent to Haakon A. Ikonomou ( Deadline for proposals: 1 April 2022.

1 December 2021
Wassenaar, 1952: Re-inventing Reparations
22-23 March 2022, Amsterdam
Please send proposals (300 words) with a one-page CV by 10 December 2021 to the conference committee at:

5 October 2021

‘Book Diplomacy’ in the Cultural Cold War: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Keynote Speaker: Professor Greg Barnhisel, Duqusense University
28-29 April 2022
Institute for History
Leiden University
Please submit an abstract of no more than 300 words to Esmaeil Haddadian-Moghaddam at Please include a working list of references and archival resources.

Deadline for submissions: 15 December 2021
Notification of acceptance: 15 January 2022
Deadline for final paper submission: 31 March 2022

27 May 2021
Diplomatic Studies of Science: The Interplay of Science, Technology, and International Affairs after the Second World War
Monday, November 8, 2021–Tuesday, November 9, 2021
9:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m. CET (UTC +1)
Maison de la Chimie
28, Rue Saint-Dominique
75007 Paris


The 2021 Gordon Cain Conference focuses on the fascinating interplay of science, technology, and international affairs after the Second World War. By doing so, it marks the emergence of diplomatic studies of science as a field at the intersection of science and technology studies, history of science, diplomatic history, and international politics. The Science History Institute and Gordon Cain Conference fellow Maria Rentetzi invite contributions that explore the ways science and diplomacy have been coproduced throughout the second half of the 20th century to the present.

To submit a paper to the 2021 Cain Conference, please send a 250-word abstract and a two-page CV to The deadline for submissions is June 13, 2021. Decisions will be made by July 7, 2021.

Travel and accommodation subsidies will be available to contributors.

Following the conference, contributors may submit draft manuscripts of approximately 5,000 words for publication in an edited volume.

17 May 2021

Languages of Diplomacy in the Eighteenth-Century World

International conference

Moscow, January 13-14, 2022

German Historical Institute in Moscow

With the support from the Richard Lounsbery Foundation

Eighteenth-century diplomacy adopted French as its main professional language, moving away from Latin and German. However, we know little about the pace and the mechanisms of and the reasons for this global linguistic shift. For example, linguistic practices of nobility influenced the choice of languages in diplomacy. Indeed, major posts in diplomacy were at the time occupied by aristocrats who embraced a model of education where the ability to socialize in French played a central role, while Latin gradually ceased to be an important part of curricula in the education of nobility. We propose to explore this change through case studies focused on the polities that were the leading players in international politics of that period and for many of whom languages were an important element of their identity and  political agenda: France, the Habsburg monarchy, the Russian Empire, Great Britain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and, towards the end of the period, the USA. Studies on other countries and language communities are welcome as well. We are inviting submissions of papers presenting the results of original research on this topic, including, but not limited to, the following aspects:

  • the choice of languages in various genres and types of communication among diplomats;
  • new trends in language use and persistence in some geographic areas of traditional languages of diplomacy (Latin, German, Spanish);
  • normative prescriptions and official policies regarding language use;
  • new trends in sociability among diplomats and the use of languages by them in non-professional settings;
  • teaching languages to future diplomats and translators in diplomatic services, in formal and informal settings;
  • translation and the formation of diplomatic terminology;
  • language lobbying in negotiations, preparation of diplomatic treaties and other diplomatic documents, etc.

Specialists in various disciplines such as historical sociolinguistics and social history of languages, new diplomatic history, history of education and of sociability are welcome to submit their proposals. The period under consideration is the “long” eighteenth century stretching from the middle of the seventeenth to the early nineteenth century.

Proposals (including title, name and affiliation of the participant, abstract of about 200 words) should be submitted to:  The deadline for proposal submission is September 15, 2021. Prospective participants will be notified about acceptance or rejection of their proposals by the end of September, 2021.

Depending on the situation with COVID-19 pandemic and travel restrictions, the conference will be held online or in a mixed offline/online format. The organizers might be able to offer financial and visa support for the participants travelling to Moscow.

Working languages of the conference are English and Russian (working languages can be modified depending on the languages of the proposals submitted).

14 September 2020

Diplomacy between Crisis and Cooperation

Fourth Conference of the New Diplomatic History Network

26-28 May 2021

Aarhus University

School of Culture and Society



Tracey Sowerby: Diplomacy in an Age of Religious Crisis

Rebecca Adler-Nissen: International Negotiations in the Age of Covid-19

The New Diplomatic History network focuses broadly on the historical study of diplomats, their methods, and their cultural, political and social networks, sites, and milieux. New diplomatic history involves the study of individuals and groups who perform diplomatic roles (but who have so far often been ignored), and the use of perspectives and methodologies from across the social sciences to bring their significance into focus. The network reasserts diplomatic actors as important subjects of historical study and encourages innovations in the understanding of evolving international society.

In the context of globalization, diplomacy has become a complex field of activity involving a host of state and non-state actors at multiple levels and forms of global, regional, and local governance. While the nation-state continues to function as the cornerstone of international order, an increasingly crowded environment has forced adaptations and alterations to all levels of diplomatic practice. New levels of complexity have now been added to this picture, as existing forms of international order have been disrupted by major economic, ecological and health crises, while zero-sum geopolitics and the rhetoric of putting the national interest “first” are firmly back on the international agenda.

At this moment, therefore, it seems pertinent to explore how diplomacy and diplomats have been shaped by and contributed to the development of international orders and connections as well as crises and conflicts across history. How have institutional frameworks altered the poise of diplomacy? How have diplomats juggled tensions between obedience to their state, professional norms and personal moral beliefs in times of crisis? What are the precedents for the condition of diplomacy in the early 21st century?

As the main meeting point for the New Diplomatic History network, this conference aims to bring together scholars working on diplomacy from different historical periods and from different disciplines across the social sciences and humanities. It links the study of diplomacy across the early modern, modern and post-modern eras, and tests the application of investigative concepts across space and time, inviting comparisons across both geographical regions and historical periods.

All proposals exploring the study of diplomacy from historical, theoretical, emotional, sensory, artistic, spatial and temporal perspectives are welcome. Please send a draft title and 500-word (max.) synopsis to

Deadline for proposals: 30 November 2020

Conference fee: 130 euro (covers lunch, coffee, tea and conference dinner)

 Note on COVID-19: We want to go ahead with our conference as originally planned. However, due to ongoing uncertainties regarding COVID-19, the conference organizers will decide in January 2021 whether to continue with an on-location conference, whether to go digital or postpone the conference till May 2022. Everyone will be informed of the decision at that point. No fees are payable before a decision has been reached. Thank you for your patience! Should the conference be postponed till 2022, all paper submissions will be carried over to the new date and all participants will have the opportunity to update/adapt/cancel their participation.

13 September 2020

Public Health and Disease in the American Century

Roosevelt Institute for American Studies

Middelburg, The Netherlands

21-22 October 2021

The COVID-19 crisis has confronted historians with the disruptive power of infectious disease. The impact of the crisis has been multifaceted, global, and immense in its scale and ramifications. For the United States, the experience has been especially confrontational. As of the time of writing, the US has among the highest rates of infection and the highest number of deaths of any country on the planet. The virus (and the measures taken to contain it) has disrupted almost every aspect of American life, revealed and exacerbated social, economic, racial and political fault lines, and raised major constitutional issues concerning the role of federal and state authorities in maintaining social well-being.

This public health emergency has also set in motion an as yet uncertain set of consequences for the US’s position in the world.  President Donald Trump has increased his criticisms of China as the source of the pandemic, and his decision to withdraw funding from the WHO was also an act to push back against Beijing’s controlling influence in that organization. Yet these steps also represent a blatantly nationalist shift, where the former role of the US in bolstering world order through multilateral institutions is being replaced by a boisterous chauvinism. The role of the federal government, both domestically and internationally, in taking responsibility for public health has come into question.

Historically, this is a pivotal moment. The arrival of the ‘American century’ at the end of the Second World War (for which the seventy-fifth anniversary celebrations have been disrupted by the pandemic) also heralded the end of global disease – a view exemplified by Secretary of State George Marshall’s 1948 prediction that the majority of infectious diseases would be eradicated within the twentieth century. Advancements in medical science, harnessed to US economic and military power, produced significant achievements in global public health – from the invention of the polio vaccine to the eradication of smallpox and the utilization of the calorie as a basic unit of nutrition. Yet the prospect of an epidemic-free world has proved illusory. Indeed, disease has made a comeback since the 1970s, as previously unknown afflictions, from HIV to Ebola and COVID-19, moved to exploit the connections, as well as the iniquities, of a globalizing world.

This conference seeks to interrogate the American Century through the lens of the US government’s responsibility for improving public health and fighting disease. It takes a broad, parabolic view of the 20th century, book-ending both domestic (the local responses to containing the Spanish flu outbreaks in 1918-1920 and the federal-state contest for control in 2020) and international developments (the Wilsonian blueprint for world order after WWI and the Trumpian abandonment of the WHO in 2020). How does the subject of public health, both domestically and internationally, change our understanding of the American Century and where we are now in 2020/2021?

We welcome conference papers on any of the following subjects:

  • Disease and US foreign policy – disease and development aid, military intervention, and as a national security threat;
  • The US, internationalism, and global public health;
  • The role of government and non-government organizations in public health and the shifting lines of responsibility
  • The connections between public health, socio-economic and racial inequalities, and political action
  • Cultural, literary, and artistic reflections on disease, social (dis)order, and public health

If you would like to join us as a speaker at this event, please send a CV and 250-word proposal to

The deadline for proposals is 1 December 2020.

All proposals will receive a reply by 31 January 2021.

The conference will be based on pre-circulated papers. Participants will be asked to prepare and send in a draft paper of 3000 words by 1 September 2021.

We hope to be able to hold the conference on location at the Institute. Of course, should this prove impossible or unwise, we will consider either postponing or switching to some form of online format.

11 August 2020


Call for Papers

This online symposium seeks to bring together new approaches to international studies (e.g. affect, material culture, public diplomacy) to examine the significance of gratitude in the history of transatlantic relations. At this stage, we refer to relations in the Northern Atlantic, specifically between North America and Europe. The goal of the symposium is to build collaborative networks and to publish a collection of articles in a peer-reviewed journal. Submit your proposals to

Topic Description

Expressions of gratitude have a long tradition in the development of transatlantic ties between Europe and North America. Since the 18th century, Americans have repeatedly expressed gratitude for French aid in the American Revolution through celebrations of Lafayette. More recently, Dutch citizens adopted the graves of American soldiers buried on Dutch soil in gratitude for the American sacrifices during the Second World War. Conversely, when members of the Trump administration described the European NATO countries as ‘ungrateful allies’, we were reminded that the (perceived) absence of gratitude between nations can highlight and even accelerate political tensions.

What is the function of gratitude in transatlantic relations? When, where, and how has it been expressed and who was involved? Have gestures of gratitude evolved over time? Reversely, has the absence of gratitude had an impact on transatlantic ties?

By identifying the presence and significance of gratitude in the long history of transatlantic relations, we hope to offer new perspectives on European-North American relations and to place, amongst other things, ordinary civilians, women, children, emotions, and material culture more firmly into the history of international relations. Following recent trends in diplomatic history, we do not mean to limit our understanding to the staged ceremonies of formal diplomatic exchange but rather urge participants to adopt a broad and inclusive exploration of the diplomatic process. This includes the roles of communities and private citizens in the development of transatlantic relations, and integrates insights from a variety of disciplines, not least cultural and social studies. Thus, we hope to develop case studies that consider gratitude in broader transatlantic cultural, political, economic, and diplomatic contexts.


Questions that we wish to consider include (but are not limited to):

  • What is the role of emotions in international and/or transnational relations? How are affective communities established and maintained?
  • What roles do performances, rituals, or sites of memory play in cultivating transatlantic relations? What is the role of images and music?
  • What roles do private actors play in the international exchange of gifts? How are official and unofficial (private) expressions of gratitude perceived and received across national boundaries?
  • What are the relationships between expressions of gratitude and relations of power?
  • In what ways is gratitude related to objects, emotions to material culture?

Online Meeting Format

One of the great benefits of conferences and symposia is to meet new people and expand networks. Unfortunately, we live in a time when opportunities to travel and meet have been greatly reduced. Therefore, we have chosen to adopt an innovative format for this symposium that is geared toward collaborative publication as well as virtual network activities.

Symposium activities which would normally take place in one day will be stretched out over a series of online activities in the period January to June, 2021. The organizers will host an initial online welcome in January 2021 and, starting in March, will hold monthly panels which combine pre-recorded videos from speakers and live panel Q&A sessions attended by speakers, chair, and participants. A final online gathering will take place in June to allow participants to draw broader connections and conclusions.

Throughout this process, participants will also be able to share abstracts, ideas, and literature on a non-public project webpage.

Publication Project

Following the symposium, a select number of participants will be invited to rework their presentations for publication in a special issue of an international, peer reviewed journal, under the general editorship of the conference organizers.

Submit a Proposal

Please send a 300 word paper proposal and a brief bio description to by 15 October 2020.

We will notify candidates about the acceptance of their proposal by 15 November 2020.

Participants will submit a full draft of their paper and present their work at an online symposium in June. After the symposium, there will be time to rework the draft for submission to a journal. Publication is subject to the outcome of the peer-review process.


For questions or expressions of interest, please contact:

Social Media


24 June 2020

A World of Realms: A Long View of Diplomacy and Spatiality in the
Premodern Islamic World.
University of Antwerp – Belgium, May 20-21, 2021
Keynote speaker: Sanjay Subrahmanyam (UCLA/Collège de France)

Power in History: Centre for Political History invites papers that inquire into the spatial dimensions of diplomacy and their relation to conceptions of territoriality in the larger Islamic world, from the 7th to the early 19th century, as part of a two-day interdisciplinary workshop held at the University of Antwerp and hosted by the History Department on May 20-21, 2021.

Deadline for abstracts: August 15, 2020.

Debates on the nature of the sovereign state as a territorially defined political entity are closely linked to discussions of “modernity” and to the development of the field of International Relations. While scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds have long questioned when and how conceptions of the “territorial state” emerged, rarely have they ventured outside the European context. A closer look at the premodern Islamic world, however, shows that “space” and “territoriality” mattered a great deal, informed interstate contacts and influenced the conduct and evolution of diplomacy. This is clear not only from one of the key concepts in Islamic law of a world divided in two dārs (‘territories’) – dār al-Islām and dār al-ḥarb –, but also from early developments in human and administrative
geography, and, more broadly, from those variegated formal texts participating in the “discourse of place.” In these conceptions, space, real or imagined, carried great significance.

Since the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate, if not earlier, ruling elites and intellectuals in the Islamic world recognized a collectivity of entities or realms (mamālik) that appear to have been territorially defined. Administrative manuals and diplomatic sources insist on a range of basic rules of respect for borders (however defined), security and immunities for emissaries (and traveling scholars, merchants and pilgrims), thus pointing to the importance attached to delineating and defining territory.

Furthermore, possession of territory granted status to rulers and therefore appears as a prerequisite of the establishment of diplomatic contact, and this independently of any supposedly fixed norms of who was/could be  considered ‘sovereign’ or not.

As both territoriality and diplomacy remain little studied in the context of the larger Islamic world, from the beginnings of Islam up to the early 1800s, this workshop invites papers that examine their connections from a spatial perspective. “Space” is key to understanding diplomacy in both a ‘high political’ sense – rulers formally recognizing one another (or not) and the making (and dissolution) of alliances – and as a practice through the dispatching or exchange of envoys. It operates on the premise that distinct entities exist and must be able to continue to exist alongside each other. Moreover, interpersonal diplomatic encounters, be they highly ritualized or informal, are always place-specific. The various qualities and functions of these (staged) sites may change over time, as do the social profiles of the actors who can enter and endow them with (new) meanings. Scholars have often emphasized the importance of asking who is allowed or barred access to the spaces of diplomacy and raised important questions as to the nature of power and domination. These questions, in turn, go to the heart of older but key issues in the historical scholarship on state-building and state-public relations.

In a world as mobile as the Islamic world, how did diplomatic practices take shape and, indeed, what meanings were ascribed to “territory” by rulers, administrators and the envoys who moved back and forth between different courts? We welcome papers dealing with the many spatial dimensions of interstate contact and particularly seek contributions that critically engage with one or more of the following themes:

– Conceptions of material space: what defined a territory and in which terminologies were they scripted (center vs frontier, city vs ‘hinterland,’ or geographic vs legal space)?

– Territory as spaces embedded in larger relational webs of territories (and related notions of boundary-making, ‘types’ of territories, shifting notions of
‘extraterritoriality’ or sovereignty)

– Perceptions and (metaphoric) representations of space (and how they changed through diplomatic contact): in cartography, manuscript illumination, prose, art, and architecture

– Imaginative space: the relevance of historical, mythical, metaphorical space

– Papers building on Lefebvre’s seminal works on the social production of space and its relation with ‘class’ domination and struggle

– The various and evolving ‘settings’ of diplomatic encounter: near borders (for the exchange of prisoners), at sea, in ‘neutral’ places, in seats of power (palaces, frontier fortresses)

– Ritual places (shrines, mosques, burial places) and their often contested significance in interstate dealings

We welcome contributions by historians, art historians, literary scholars, political scientists, anthropologists, archeologists, archivists, and philologists on any subject that falls in the period between the 7th to the early 19th century, when Muslim polities increasingly reverted to resident diplomacy. We prefer papers that depart from the perspective of Muslim states (and draw on the sources they left behind) and investigate their interactions with either Muslim or non-Muslim polities (or both). Along with contributions on the various major Islamic states in the Maghreb, Western and Central Africa, Middle East, Europe, and Central, South and Southeast Asia – including, but not limited to the Umayyads, Abbasids, Nasrids, Mongols, Mamluks, Hafsids, Mandinkas (Mali Empire), Kanembus (Bornu Empire), Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals – we also encourage papers on pastoral nomad and peripheral groups and their interactions with Muslim polities.

The organizers will be able to cover part of the expenses of participants. An exception can be made for those whose institution does not provide any allowance for conference participation. As papers (in English and max. 8000 words) will be pre-circulated, selected speakers will have to submit their draft papers no later than mid-April 2021. They also commit to revise their papers for future inclusion in a peer-reviewed collective publication.

Submissions for papers should include: name, main affiliation, paper title, abstract (max. 250 words) and a short bio (max. 50 words).

Deadline: please send all proposals to and no later than August 15, 2020.

Notifications of acceptance will be sent out by late August 2020.

27 January 2020

Internationalism(s) and Education during the Cold War.

Actors, Rivalries and Circulations

International Conference
University of Lausanne
June 24-25, 2021

Organized by Raphaëlle Ruppen Coutaz (University of Lausanne) and Damiano Matasci

(University of Geneva)

Deadline: September 15, 2020: Please send proposals to the following addresses:, Abstracts (300 words max. in word or pdf files) will include a title, a specific issue, a bibliography (5 references max.) and a short bio-bibliographic notice (15 lines max.).

Details in the attached pdf: Geneva 2021

10 December 2019

Diplomacy and the Natural Environment
(Diplomatica special issue)
deadline for submissions: 15 February 2020

For this special issue of Diplomatica we invite proposals for essays on aspects of diplomacy’s relationship to the natural environment. Essays may cover any historical period up to the present-day. The central questions that this special issue poses are:

How does the natural environment condition, cause, or complicate diplomatic action?

How does diplomacy affect relations between humanity and nature?

How has ‘nature’ been used in theory and in practice to further or cast into question diplomatic relations?

Possible topics include:

– Plant, animal, and mineral specimens as objects and/or subjects of diplomatic exchange;

– The relationship of concepts and/or metaphors of natural order, the state of nature, etc. to diplomacy;

– Negotiations relating to the environment, climate change, conservation, etc.;

– Visual, literary, musical, and cinematic depictions of nature in diplomatic contexts;

Please send expressions of interest, or abstracts of 500 words and a brief bio-note to the issue editors, by 15 February 2020. Please quote ‘Diplomacy and the Natural Environment’ in the subject line.

Notification of acceptance will be no later than 15 March 2020. If accepted, full essays (of 7000 to 9000 words) will be due by 15 January 2021.

Review-essays and interviews pertinent to the special issue are also very welcome. Please contact the journal editors with any questions.

10 December 2019

Scandinavian Internationalist Diplomacy, 1920s-1970s

Call for Papers for three workshops at the University of Copenhagen (27-29 May 2020), Södertörn University (September 2020) and the University of Oslo (January 2021)

The Scandinavian countries are often seen as being among the most consistent promoters of internationalist solutions to global challenges and can boast some of the most renowned internationalist figures of the 20th Century. Scandinavia, moreover, sees itself, and is often recognized, as a region representing and promoting a certain set of values (such as democracy, social equality and progressive ideals on rights) on the international stage. While there are truths in these stereotypes, the role and reputation of Scandinavian international politics developed in a complex symbiosis between the rise of international organizations (IOs) and professionalization of foreign services (as part of the construction of the modern state) from the turn of the last century onwards. There is a large body of literature on how the various (non-state) internationalist strands developing from the late 1800s onwards were absorbed into the corporatist structures of the Scandinavian post-war welfare state. However, very little research exists, that (a) studies Scandinavian internationalism as a transnational historical phenomenon, (b) that is intrinsically linked to the rise of IOs and (c) is rooted in expanding diplomatic practices.

This workshop trilogy (see descriptions of workshops below) brings these elements together in a systematic fashion, to study the emergence of Scandinavian internationalist diplomacy between the 1920s and the 1970s. By centring on a wider conception of diplomatic institutions, actors and practices and positioning Scandinavia within the new literature on internationalisms and international organizations, the workshop series aims to:

1) Critically analyse the established narrative of a distinct Scandinavian internationalism by exploring it as part of new diplomatic practices within the new ‘space’ between international organizations, national foreign services and new diplomatic actors.

2) Study Scandinavian internationalism as evidenced in diplomatic practices and exploring it as a distinct realization of national interests – neither a priori benign nor malign – in its transnational context.

3) By building on a broad definition of what constitutes diplomacy, the workshop series connects what is often studied separately: state-driven, traditional diplomacy and the internationalist endeavours of non-state actors (from single individuals and groups of activists via civil society organizations to key corporations).

4) Offer a new, comprehensive chronology of Scandinavian internationalist diplomacy, and to critically interpret this within the broader and later more dominant Nordic conceptualization of internationalism.

Keynotes may be found here:

Guide for participants:

Prospective participants are invited to submit an abstract (400 words) to the organizers of the relevant workshop no later than 1 February 2020.

Workshop 1: Haakon A. Ikonomou:

Workshop 2: Andreas Hellenes:

Workshop 3: Sunniva Engh:

Selected participants will be expected to submit their full papers (minimum 4000 words) to the relevant workshop organizers for pre-circulation two weeks prior to the relevant workshop.

Workshop 1: Scandinavian Multilateral Diplomacy: from the League of Nations to post-war IOs

27-29 May 2020, University of Copenhagen
Organizers: Haakon A. Ikonomou and Rasmus S. Søndergaard

Over the last hundred years, diplomacy has become increasingly nested in multiple IOs, from the League of Nations, via the United Nations and several economic and security organizations after the Second World War, to the European Union. This development has profoundly shaped how states do foreign politics and, arguably, how they articulate their very interests. The impact has been particularly drastic for small states, such as the Scandinavian. Indeed, the bureaucratic professionalization of Scandinavian diplomacy was driven not only with the formalization of the modern state apparatus but found its shape and purpose within an expanding international and regional space. With the rise of international organizations, small states found new multilateral forums in which to articulate and pursue interests, alliances and brands. This workshop will explore how the ‘vertical’ transnational space between national foreign services and international organizations shaped Scandinavian multilateral diplomacy. Within this scope, the workshop, in particular, welcomes papers on:

  • Administrative reforms, codes of conducts and recruitment patterns of Scandinavian foreign services as part of a global circulation of knowledge, expertise and imaginations of efficiency, power and modernity
  • Patterns of exchange in personnel between Scandinavian foreign services and IOs
  • Specific transnational spaces of multilateral diplomacy, including cooperation between Scandinavian diplomats and foreign services within IOs
  • The role of the Nordic model(s) in Scandinavian multilateral diplomacy
  • Critical examinations of the origin and promotion of the Scandinavian brand as global good Samaritans committed to peace, solidarity and human rights

Workshop 2: Scandinavian Public Diplomacies Beyond State Actors

September 2020, Södertörn University (exact dates to TBD)
Organizers: Carl Marklund and Andreas Hellenes

The first post-war decade saw the earliest institutionalisation of Scandinavian public diplomacy, although roots stretch back to the interwar years. The new institutions relied on the assistance of other actors representing the mainstream internationalism of cultural relations and international trade, as well as the Scandinavian popular movements. These internationalisms not only co-existed with the state-administered public diplomacy but were co-constitutive on an organisational level and entangled in the activities pursued by the states abroad. The interface and exchange between different forms of diplomacy – traditional, public, economic, military, social and citizen diplomacy – are understudied at present. We wish to address the spectrum of divergent diplomatic practices in the plural – public diplomacies – by specifically investigating the state-civil society nexus in Scandinavia and beyond. This nexus was not least a result of the small size of the national elites; personal contacts and networks were easily transplanted from the national to the international level. This workshop will explore how the emergence of the international field allowed for a variety of methods and multi-positionalities for Scandinavian diplomatic entrepreneurs, sometimes acting in their own name, sometimes in the name of the state, and often in interplay between the two. The workshop sets out to go beyond the study of statist public diplomatic action and expand the notion of the public diplomat to involve non-governmental actors, movements and corporations. We therefore welcome papers that study for example:

  • The organisation and institutionalisation of Scandinavian public diplomacies as contested fields between political, economic and cultural national interests and internationalist ideas of cooperation and exchange
  • Scandinavian cooperation in joint public diplomacy efforts in international sites – agendas, arenas, events and organisations
  • The role of the Scandinavian popular movements in spearheading internationalist initiatives at home and abroad
  • Alternative Scandinavian internationalisms within transnational networks independently or in coordination with the publicly sponsored varieties

Workshop 3: Scandinavian Internationalists: Transnational Biographical Entry Points January 2021, University of Oslo (exact dates to TBD)

Organizers: Sunniva Engh and Niels Brimnes

As an approach, the biography has the strength that it can link the individual to broader structural developments. The protagonist both provides “valuable sensors for general trends and changes in society” and serves a privileged, specific and manageable point of entry to large and complex processes. For the biography to work as a sensory tool for the genealogy of Scandinavian internationalist diplomacy, it needs to be fundamentally transnational in scope. A transnational gaze allows us to explore their productive role at the nexus of new modes of global governance, rapidly professionalizing foreign service, and increasingly internationally organized non-state actors. In particular, the workshop takes interest in individuals that operated across the traditional state/non-state division and seeks to understand how they negotiated and were shaped by tensions between the agendas of state and non-state actors. Another strength of the biographical approach is that by tracing specific lives and careers the historian often transcends, bridges and challenges taken for granted historical periodisations. Thus, a concrete aim of the workshop is to compare and connect narratives of various prominent Scandinavian protagonists that had their formative experiences in the interwar period and would continue their internationalist endeavours into the post-war years. By tying together these biographies, we are able to get at the role played by the first generations of 20th century internationalist diplomats, and how the ‘capital’ accumulated in the interwar years translated into post-war currency. The workshop welcomes papers on issues such as:

  • How Scandinavian internationalist figures contributed to and / or capitalized on specific visions of Scandinavia as societies that were socially just and peaceful
  • How Scandinavian internationalists negotiated tensions between the agendas of state and non-state actors
  • ‘Forgotten’ Scandinavian internationalist from non-State actors such as activist NGOs
  • Papers that address methodological issues in writing biographies on internationalist protagonists
  • Papers that address the role of professional networks in furthering international engagement

Important dates:
Deadline for abstracts: 1 February 2020.
Notification of acceptance: 15 February 2020.
Deadline for full papers: two weeks prior to the relevant workshop.

Practical information:

The organisers will cover travel expenses, meals and accommodation during the workshops.

For general enquiries, please contact Haakon A. Ikonomou:

20 May 2019

Call for papers for the 2020 MatchPoints Seminar at Aarhus University, 23-25 April 2020: “Denmark and Germany in Europe – Cooperation, Conflict and Future Challenges”

Since 2007, Aarhus University has hosted the annual MatchPoints Seminar, bringing together researchers, politicians, business representatives and civil society organisations to discuss critical, current societal issues. We are happy to announce the topic of the 2020 MatchPoints Seminar; Denmark and Germany in Europe – Cooperation, Conflict and Future Challenges, and researchers are now invited to submit paper proposals for the Seminar, which will take place on 23-25 April 2020.

2020 is an important year in Danish-German relations. Proclaimed official Danish-German cultural friendship-year, the year 2020 also marks the centenary of today’s Danish-German border, the 75th anniversary of the end of the Second World War, the 65th anniversary of the Copenhagen-Bonn Agreements on national minorities in the Danish-German Borderland, and the 30th anniversary of German reunification. The 2020 MatchPoints Seminar wishes to explore and discuss important developments and patterns of interaction in the Danish-German relationship since the 19th century and situate current and former Danish-German cultural, political and economic relations in their broader European contexts. In doing so, the seminar emphasises the vital importance for both countries of collaboration with other European countries in shaping a common European future.

The MatchPoints Seminar will offer a wide range of keynote lectures and panel debates by speakers of the highest prominence. These include, among others, columnist, historian and Professor Anne Applebaum, Professor Wolfgang Ischinger (tbc), Professor Astrid Erll, Professor Ole Wæver and leading German and Danish politicians and government officials. The paper sessions of the seminar will be organised around the following four themes:

State, nation, nationalism and borders in the Danish-German relationship 1820-2020

  • Border Issues prior to and after 1871
  • German-Nordic Relations and the Re-making of the European Order after 1919
  • The German Model and its Role in the European Economic Space after 1945
  • Germany, Denmark and the New Geopolitical Turn in European Politics

Danish-German-European cultural change and exchange

  • Critical Theory and the Legacies of 1968
  • Memory Culture
  • Media and Identity
  • Movement and Migration

Danish-German-European-Global economic integration and cooperation (still in planning)

  • Clean Tech
  • Barriers to Trade – Germany / Denmark
  • EMU Challenges
  • Labour Market – National, European, and Global

Together in the EU: the future of the European Union

  • Populism and Euroscepticism
  • Migration: Social and Political Challenges
  • European Security
  • European Cohesion

More information:
The seminar wishes to encourage interdisciplinary research and dialogue and invites researchers from across the humanities, political and social science, economics and law to submit papers in relation to any of the four themes.

Confirmed speakers:

  • Columnist, historian and Professor Anne Applebaum, London School of Economics
  • Professor Astrid Erll, Goethe University Frankfurt
  • Professor Ole Wæver, University of Copenhagen
  • Professor Elizabeth Buettner, Amsterdam University
  • Professor Steen Bo Frandsen, University of Southern Denmark
  • Associate Professor Morten Rasmussen, University of Copenhagen
  • Associate Professor Jes Fabricius Møller, University of Copenhagen
  • Senior Lecturer Dagmar Brunow, Linnæus University
  • Senior Lecturer Michael Jonas, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg
  • Professor Christian Martin, New York University/Kiel University
  • Professor Florian Trauner, Institute for European Studies (IES) at the Vrije Universiteit Brussels

Non-confirmed speakers:

  • Professor Wolfgang Ischinger, Hertie School of Business, Berlin
  • Professor Harold Marcuse, UC Santa Barbara.

Time and place:
23-25 April 2020 at Aarhus University, The Lakeside Lecture Theatres, Bartholins Allé 3, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Deadline for paper proposals:
10 June 2019.

The paper proposal must not exceed 300 words and should include a brief outline of the topic, argument and the paper itself, information about which theme and session(s) the paper relates to and contact details of the presenter. At the seminar, each speaker will be allotted 15 minutes to presents his/her paper, no written papers are required. Abstracts, including a short CV, should be sent to

Fees and registration

Early bird – approx. DKK 1200 incl. VAT (EUR 160)
Late bird – approx. DKK 1700 incl. VAT (EUR 225)
Registration opens January 2020

Professor Thorsten Borring Olesen is Chair and Coordinator of the MatchPoints Seminar 2020. The Seminar has further set up an organising committee consisting of members from both within and outside Aarhus University. See the complete list of members of the steering committee here 

1 February 2019

Call for Participants: unconventional diplomacy panels at BIHG

New Diplomatic History themed panels at the British International History Group (BIHG) conference, Lancaster University (UK), 5-7 September 2019

Dear colleagues,

We are looking to put together two linked panels of three speakers each for the BIHG conference in 2019. We would like to see New Diplomatic History ideas and approaches well represented at this conference.

We therefore invite participants to join our two panels, both of which will be on the theme of ‘unconventional diplomacy’. We are open to very broad interpretations of this theme, including but not limited to:

  • Official/state-sponsored diplomats acting in unconventional roles or using unconventional methods (broadly defined)
  • Official state representatives outside the ‘normal’ diplomatic fraternity (e.g. spies as diplomats)
  • Non-state actors in a diplomatic role
  • The activities of retired diplomats

The BIHG conference details can be found at:

We are looking for up to six panellists working on ‘unconventional diplomacy’ across any time period and are keen to involve a broad range of approaches, geographies and periods. We welcome participation by postgraduate and early career researchers as well as more established scholars.

If you are interested, please send a 250 word abstract and brief biography (around 150 words) to both:

Alexander Shaw –

Giles Scott-Smith –

Deadline for application: 18 February 2019

(in order to ensure we can compose the panels in time for submission to the BIHG deadline on 1 March).

6 November 2018

The Affective Glue of European Integration: The role of transnational political, religious, and economic networks and their shared emotional vocabulary in shaping European integration (1930-’57)

Utrecht University 8-9 April 2019

How have transnational networks shaped the start-up of European integration (1930-1957) and how did they develop and make use of a shared emotional vocabulary to articulate their ambitions, dreams, longings, and dreads in this respect?

While there have been numerous accounts of the early years of European integration emphasizing the importance of economic and (geo-)political interests, the emotional dimension in the history of European integration has often been overlooked.

Research on the role of emotions in international relations has shown that emotions both inform the perception of interests and ideas, and are actively used to mobilize or constrain support for certain political ideas. Moreover, emotions are important to understand the interactions among policy-making elites. For example, a shared emotive vocabulary facilitates political negotiations, and political ideas that are tied to dominant “emotion norms” (i.e. affective glue) can be expected to be more successful.

Since the early years of European integration were characterized by an initial rather “open” competition among alternative blueprints of a future European order, it is of critical importance to examine the way in which both backward-looking emotions based on experiences (such as trust and hate) and forward-looking emotions underpinning expectations (such as hope and fear), shaped both the substantive ideas of those blueprints as well as the interaction among policymaking elites.

Transnational networks, overlapping in political, economic and religious make-up, and in intra-European and trans-Atlantic geographical spheres, were the key fora that enabled competing ideas and emotions to be articulated, shaped, and developed. Hence, these transnational networks may tell us in what ways fear, hope and (dis)trust informed the European integration process. How were emotional beliefs tied to a specific religious vocabulary, such as reconciliation, solidarity, and responsibility, mobilized to gain support for particular blueprints of Europe?

In light of the accumulated attention for emotions and transnational networks among historians and international relations scholars, this workshop aims to bring together researchers working on the “affective glue” of European integration in its early years, from the 1930s until the launch of the European Economic Community (1957).

We welcome papers that address the following topics:

• The role of individual key actors in the articulation or political translation of blueprints and their transnational relations with other players in the field;

• The role and interaction of specific hubs and groups (political, economic, ecumenical) in shaping the start-up of European integration (circle of friends, group of civil servants, diplomats, entrepreneurs, etc.);

• The development of and contestation over central emotional beliefs concerning blueprints of Europe, both over time and at critical junctures (genealogy of ‘hope’, ‘solidarity’, ‘responsible society’, etc.);

• Theoretical approaches on the role of emotions and emotional beliefs in understanding the history of European integration.

As part of this workshop we will study the options for a special issue/edited volume. The workshop takes place at Utrecht University on 8 & 9 April 2019. Travel (within Europe) and accommodation will be provided for paper-givers.

• Deadline abstract (300-500 words) & short biography: 11 January 2019. Abstracts should be sent to Dr Trineke Palm at We will inform applicants by 31 January 2019.

• Deadline full paper (8.000-10.000 words): 29 March 2019.

23 July 2018

Exposing Secrets: The Past, Present and Future of U.S. National Security Whistleblowing and Government Secrecy

An Interdisciplinary Conference involving Scholars, Journalists, Whistleblowers, and Advocates

17-18 January 2019

New York University London Campus, 6 Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London, UK

Keynote Speakers include
Ewan MacAskill: Pulitzer Prize-winning defence and intelligence correspondent for The Guardian
John Kiriakou: Former CIA-analyst and case officer who was prosecuted after exposing torture

Edward Snowden and National Security Agency mass surveillance; Reality Winner and Russian interference in U.S. elections; James Comey and Donald Trump’s obstruction of justice. National security whistleblowing continues to shape history and stir controversy in and beyond the U.S. Drawing on political, legal, journalistic and cultural perspectives, this international, public conference will explore among other topics:

● The contested definition of whistleblowing versus “leaking” and “unauthorized disclosure”
● The relationship between whistleblowers and journalists
● Whistleblowing and the evolution of information: “big data”
● The legality of whistleblowing and the challenges of advocacy
● Whistleblowers in popular culture
● State deterrence of whistleblowing: old and new mechanisms
● Whistleblowing as a transnational phenomenon
● Publishers: From traditional media to WikiLeaks

We welcome individual submissions, as well as proposed panels and roundtables. Please send a 500-word abstract and brief 1-2 page bio/cv to by 15 September 2018.

Kaeten Mistry (University of East Anglia)
Hannah Gurman (New York University)
For more see:

12 June 2018

Call for Papers: Culture & International History VI: Visions of Humanity

 6 – 8 May 2019 in Berlin

 John F. Kennedy Institute, Freie Universität Berlin

The conference Culture and International History VI will take place from the 6th through the 8th of May, 2019 in Berlin. Siep Stuurman (Universiteit Utrecht), author of The Invention of Humanity: Equality and Cultural Difference in World History (Harvard UP, 2017), will deliver the keynote speech. The conference marks the 20th anniversary of the symposium cycle that began in 1999 and has since taken place in Wittenberg, Frankfurt, Cologne, and Berlin. Key themes and contributions have been published in Berghahn Books’ series Explorations in Culture and International History (Oxford, New York, since 2003).

“Visions of Humanity” seeks to address the growing interest in historical ideas, statements, policies and actions invoking transnational, international and global audiences in the name of common values, rights and concerns. These may be manifest in activism relating to human rights, policies invoking humanitarian action, cultural output imagining trans-border societies, ideas wedding technology and the human, international protest against mechanisms of marginalization, cross-cultural canon-building (“the humanities”) and attempts to define “humanity” in academic disciplines. International history is full of people and organizations invoking visions of humanity in an effort to create common notions of identity (“we”) based on international and global reference points. But who constituted “we”? What made “us” similar? Who was part of humanity, who wasn’t? What were the mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion in humanity? And who defined and contested these criteria and decisions?

The symposium will focus on visions of humanity as they crystallize in the history of diplomatic and informal fora as well as in the context of specific debates. Specifically, the conference seeks to compare 20th century approaches in North American and transatlantic history to other regions and earlier periods. Possible topics include but are not limited to:

  • The human rights diplomacy of indigenous people
  • Arts, international relations and visions of humanity
  • Humanity and the humanities in international exchange
  • The concept of humanity in diplomatic and legal parlance
  • Minority rights vs. universal rights in international history
  • Cultural diplomacy in the name of human rights & humanitarian action

We invite students and scholars of International History, Modern History, Area Studies, Theater Studies, Cultural Studies, Musicology, Art History, Psychology, Social Science, Anthropology and related fields to submit proposals before July 8, 2018. Young scholars are particularly encouraged to apply. Proposals should include 1. a brief cover letter, 2. the title of the paper and an abstract of max. 500 words, 3. a one-page CV. All three should be submitted in one pdf file. Proposals for panels will also be considered (chair/commentator, three panelists). Pending approval, individual speakers may apply for funds covering the cost of travel and accommodation and should mention this in their application. Participants who have an interest in the topic and would like to attend the conference without delivering a paper are welcome and should contact Verena Specht.

Please submit proposals and questions to:

Jessica Gienow-Hecht

Sebastian Jobs

Sönke Kunkel

9 January 2018

CFP: Bridging Divides: Third Conference of the New Diplomatic History Network

24-26 October 2018

Roosevelt Institute for American Studies


The Netherlands


Naoko Shimazu (Yale-NUS College Singapore)

John Watkins (University of Minnesota)

The New Diplomatic History network focuses broadly on the historical study of diplomats, their methods, and their cultural, political and social milieux. New diplomatic history involves the study of individuals and groups who perform diplomatic roles (but who have so far often been ignored), and the use of perspectives and methodologies from across the social sciences to bring their significance into focus. The network reasserts diplomatic actors as important subjects of historical study while being open to innovations in the understanding of evolving international society.

In the context of globalization, diplomacy has become a complex field of activity involving a host of state and non-state actors in multiple levels and forms of global, regional, and local governance. While the nation-state continues to function as the cornerstone of international order, an increasingly crowded environment has forced adaptations and alterations to all levels of diplomatic practice. Diplomatic studies has duly followed these developments, broadening its scope of attention and theoretical approach in the process.

Yet is this expansion of the diplomatic field only confined to the recent era of globalization? Has diplomacy not always involved a range of actors and interests, even during the heyday of statist diplomacy in recent centuries? Was the state-led modern era unique in the long history of diplomatic practice? How have institutional frameworks altered the poise of diplomacy over time? What are the precedents for the condition of diplomacy in the early 21st century?

As the main meeting point for the New Diplomatic History network, this conference aims to bring together scholars working on diplomacy from different historical periods and from different disciplines across the social sciences and humanities. It intends to link the study of diplomacy across the early modern, modern and post-modern eras, and test the application of investigative concepts across space and time, inviting comparisons across both geographical regions and historical periods.

All proposals exploring the study of diplomacy from theoretical, emotional, sensory, artistic, spatial and temporal perspectives are welcome. Please send a draft title and 500-word (max.) synopsis to

Deadline for proposals: 1 March 2018

20 November 2017

CFP: Global Diplomacy: A Post-Institutional Approach

Basel/Bern 30 August — 1 September 2018

This conference aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on the transformation of modern diplomacy from an instrument of arcane foreign policy to an intermediary between foreign policy and transnational and transboundary networks. As mentioned in recent research debates (e.g. Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy 2013), the merging of diplomacy, global governance, international relations and international law stands at the core of a paradigmatic shift which overcomes institutional limitations by specifying collaborative activities and multifunctional actors in international politics on a global scale. The conference addresses the theoretical and methodological challenges which result from the tensions between an institutional understanding of foreign relations as activities of a sovereign state and the obvious impact of informal activities shaping politics and public spheres as ‹civil diplomacy› not investigated so far. The conference has a strong interest in methodological debates, asking to what extent the history of institutions is useful for documenting the limits of normative orders and rules. Following this perspective, the Swiss case might offer a starting point for similar cases where global expertise oversteps formal limitations in international politics.

Panel I: Networking on Diplomatic and Consular Levels: Western strategies for Asia 1860s to 1945

(Semi-)colonial settings, concession areas and extraterritorial spaces allow studying the interferences between territory-based governance and the regional impact of various global actors on different regions and international societies. Blurring the apparent difference between East and West, Asia presents an interesting opportunity to investigate the dynamic development of multilayered spaces from the 1860s onwards. The main questions addressed are: How did formal colonial powers as well as states profiting from most-favored nation clauses organize their system of representation in different Asian areas? How and to what extent were non-state actors, e.g. merchants as honorary consuls, as well as professional state actors involved in these diplomatic processes? And to what extent did local intermediaries use, transform and profit from extraterritorial claims? Starting with (but overstepping) the Swiss case as an example for the inclusion of non-state actors and for network-based diplomacy in Asia, the panel aims at developing a sense of converging and diverging diplomatic structures, processes and strategies of different Western states.

Panel II: Entitlements, Practices and Governance on a Global Level

The second panel focuses on the variety of global diplomacy’s actors. The increasing range of thematic issues seems to be a huge challenge for foreign ministries and international organizations. The main questions are: Who is entitled to act on behalf of a state? What is the personal background, the training and education of diplomatic personnel around the globe or the staff working for international organizations? To what extent do foreign ministries guide and control diplomatic relations? And what is the impact of experts and non-state actors with view to the complexity of diplomacy?

Panel III: Neutrals and Neutral States as Global Actors – Motivations, Perceptions, and Economic Interests

Besides considering more actors in international politics, a post-institutional understanding of diplomacy challenges established norms and concepts. Acting as intermediaries in times of war, neutral states offer an opportunity to investigate multifunctional activities, including the question of profits and losses resulting from negotiations on behalf of warring states. In addition, the panel will focus on the interactions between neutrals, including tensions between different understandings of neutrality as an under-investigated perspective in research. As a third aspect, the debate addresses humanitarian interventions from non-state actors, which, in recent debates, are considered as important intermediaries in non-violent interventions. However, beyond the case of ICRC, their activities and practices are less known in historical research, especially when it comes to their activities in the Pacific War. As a forth perspective, the panel addresses the question of who is acting from a neutral position or one perceived as such. Including Jewish organizations active during World War II, the debate compares status and scope of action of neutral non-state actors with regard to enemy aliens and allies on a global scale.

Panel IV: Digital Humanities in the Study of Global Diplomacy

With a new understanding of diplomacy as a field connecting different actors across borders, historiography oversteps the limits of diplomatic source material. The panel will test methodological approaches which are suitable for actor-network analysis and database focused research. To what extent has the digital accessibility of diplomatic documents transformed methodologies and fields of interest in diplomatic history? With JACAR and Dodis as main tools, this panel will take databases into account that allow following diplomatic career patterns, the geographical extension of diplomatic representation and the close entanglement of global trade with diplomatic representation. Besides the presentation of newly developed digital tools with the Asia Directories database among others, the panel will on one hand address the methodological challenges of making available diplomatic connections on a global scale. On the other hand, historians working within digital humanities projects will discuss the opportunities of hyperconvergent infrastructure and ways to share source material.

Panel V: Diplomacy, Transnational Law and Global Studies (interdisciplinary panel)

This concluding panel encompasses the methodological and theoretical framing of new actors in international relations and their problem-solving capacity. With a special focus on refugees and stateless persons, it sheds light on the merging of diplomacy, global governance, international relations and international law. The handling of these two groups of actors shows the limits of traditional foreign and international relations and in doing so, paves the way for an interdisciplinary debate on global governance.

The conference aims to bring together historians as well as researchers from the social sciences and related disciplines with an interest in the history of diplomacy, transnational law and global governance. A common goal is to challenge the former Eurocentric and state-focused diplomatic history in favor of a global history of diplomacy which takes into account border-crossing entanglements and transnational networks.

We invite PhD students, postdocs and senior academics to apply and want to encourage women researchers to send their proposals in order to reach a gender-balanced representation at the conference. Please send your proposal for a paper including information about the applicant (max. 3’000 characters, preferred file format: PDF) to Thomas Bürgisser (thomas.bü until January 15th, 2018. All proposals will undergo a peer review process. Notification of acceptance will be sent out by May 2018. For more information, see:

Scientific Committee

Prof. Dr. Madeleine Herren-Oesch (Instiute for European Global Studies University of Basel)
Prof. Dr. Toshiki Mogami (Waseda University, Tokyo)
Prof. Dr. Atsushi Shibasaki (Komazawa University, Tokyo)
Prof. Dr. Glenda Sluga (University of Sydney)
Dr. Sacha Zala (Diplomatic Documents of Switzerland / University of Bern)

Organizing Committee

Dr. Thomas Bürgisser
Cornelia Knab
Dominik Matter
Julian Wettengel

25 October 2017

CFP: New Public Diplomacy

The third issue of the Revista Chilena de Relaciones Internacionales will be completely dedicated to the New Public Diplomacy. Researchers from the areas of International Relations, International Studies, History, and Political Science are welcome to submit their original research articles, or reviews of academic texts, related to the proposed topic.

Since the rise of the New Public Diplomacy, in contraposition to the Traditional Public Diplomacy that sees directs relations only between states, academy has seen the emergence of a wider dimension in the international relations among states. This way, the incorporation of new actors in the world arena makes it unavoidable to ask about the course that the diplomatic technique has adopted, as well as the consequences of the new angles detected.

Academic literature available on the also called “Kinds of Diplomacy” are usually scarce in Spanish because most of the them have been analyzed and developed in Europe and North America. This issue seeks to expand the debate around very current topics such as business sport, digital, cultural, gastronomic, scientific, religious, ethnic, military, environmental, educational, humanitarian, citizen, celebrity, or sub-state diplomacies, among many others.

Research articles covering some of those topics, its roots, objectives, perspective, challenges, and opportunities will be accepted considering the new tendencies of the political communication, the different national interests, and the particular openness, transparency, and active participation that the citizens all over the world demand in all the governmental aspects, including Foreign Policy.

Abstracts’ submission date is inevitably due on December 10th, 2017; any document in a language other than Spanish, English, or Portuguese will not be considered. The complete article due date will be February 2nd, 2018, and the publication of the issue will be March 30th, 2018. Documents must be sent to cc in format .doc, .docx or .pdf. For further information about the authors’ guidelines, please see

Revista Chilena de Relaciones Internacionales ensures a process of peer review complying with the academic standards of blind review, without any discrimination regarding gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality, or political ideology of the authors.

12 October 2017

CFP- Negotiating Networks: new research on networks in social and economic history

One day conference – 25th June 2018

Institute of Historical Research, University of London

Keynote: Sheryllynne Haggerty, University of Nottingham

This conference will bring together scholars working on networks in social and economic history, broadly defined, with a particular focus on those using Social Network Analysis (SNA) in their research. SNA has become increasingly popular as one of the key digital tools for historical research in recent years. We would like to encourage conversation and exchange of ideas between researchers who use this methodology.

We welcome proposals for papers from postgraduate, early career and established scholars working in this area. The aim of the conference is to bring together researchers dealing with the challenges and rewards of examining historical networks.  We therefore encourage papers dealing with the medieval, early modern or modern periods and any geographical location. Papers which take a methodological approach to historical SNA are also welcome.

Possible themes include, but are not limited to:

Economic networks: business, trade and material culture

Religious and cultural networks: networks of minorities and marginalised groups, confessional networks

Interactions between networks and other themes in socio-economic history e.g. migration, institutions

Methodological issues in historical SNA

Please send abstracts of 250 words for 20 minute papers to Esther Lewis and Charlie Berry at by 30th January 2018. We hope to offer bursaries for attendance for speakers and travel for postgraduate and ECR attendees.

10 October 2017

CFP: The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 and the Challenge of a New World Order

International Conference to be held in Paris, 5-8 June 2019

Under the aegis of the Institut historique allemand (IHA)/Deutsches Historisches Institut Paris (DHIP), LABEX EHNE, Commission d’histoire des relations internationales/Commission for the History of International Relations

The Peace Conference held in Paris in the aftermath of the Great War remains among the most important yet also most controversial events in modern history.  Although it is often considered to have made a second global war all but inevitable, it has also been praised for providing the basis for an enduring peace that was squandered recklessly by poor international leadership during the 1930s.

A major international conference will take place in Paris in June 2019 to commemorate the centenary of the 1919 Conference from a global perspective. The purpose of this event is to re-examine the history of the Peace Conference through a thematic focus on the different approaches to order in world politics in the aftermath of the First World War. A remarkably wide range of actors in Paris – from political leaders, soldiers and diplomats to colonial nationalist envoys and trade unionists, economists, women’s associations and ordinary citizens – produced a wide array of proposals for a future international and, indeed, global order. These proposals were often based on vastly different understandings of world politics. They went beyond the articulation of specific national security interests to make claims about the construction and maintenance of peace and the need for new norms and new institutions to achieve this aim. To what extent the treaties and their subsequent implementation represented a coherent order remains a question of debate.

By ‘order’, we mean in the first instance, the articulation and development of systematic ideas, institutions and practices aimed at promoting a durable peace that would deliver security, economic recovery and social justice. This distinguishes thinking about ‘order’ from discussions of ‘national interests’ – though there was of course overlap between these two modes of thinking about future international relations. Second, we are interested in ‘order’ as an analytical concept in its own right. This encourages historians to identify, as Paul Schroeder has urged, the shared rules, assumptions, and understandings about a particular set of political relations and to show how specific decisions reflect the norms of the order.

Emphasising the preoccupation of peace-makers with the problem of world order broadens the scope of the familiar questions and debates that have dominated the literature on the Peace Conference.  It also opens the way for posing new questions and for thinking about more familiar questions in new ways. We therefore invite papers addressing the following questions:

  1. What were the different conceptions of political, economic and social order advocated at the Paris Conference? What was the relationship between different ideas about the international order, such as a system based on national self-determination and one based on the rule of law? Were there broad over-arching conceptions of an international order, such as liberal or socialist internationalism, that could accommodate more narrowly focused ideas such as free trade or labour rights? How did people conceive of the relationships between self-interest and order? What role did power politics play in conceptions of international order? Were the absentees from Paris – notably the Germans and the Bolsheviks – able to shape the debate about the emerging international order?
  2. What were the origins of these different ideas about order? Why was there such an interest in the systematic development of particular orders both during and after the war? Who produced ideas about order, and why? What was in particular the role of NGOs and ordinary citizens? Can an approach based on different ‘generations’ of international actors illuminate this problem in new ways? Was the idea of ‘order’ a reaction to international politics before and during the war? Or did it represent a continuity with certain strands of thinking about international politics that pre-dated the outbreak of war in 1914? What was the relationship between the articulation of war aims and ideas about post-war order?
  3. To what extent did contending visions of an international order shape the peace treaties? Did the organization and proceedings of the Conference reflect tensions between the national, the regional and the global? What was the role of regional orders in shaping broader conceptions of a new world order? To what extent did discourses concerning new regional orders reflect fundamental changes in the conceptualization of world politics? To what extent were they a repackaging of the more familiar themes of empire or spheres of influence?
  4. How were the peace treaties legitimated to domestic and international audiences? Were subsequent negotiations on the implementation and revision of the peace treaties shaped by the profound debates about international politics that took place before and during the Peace Conference? Were conceptions of international order systematically subordinated to concerns about national security? Conversely, to what extent can it be argued that the Paris Peace Conference produced or contributed to a disorder in European politics that led ultimately to the Second World War?
  5. What was the impact of the Paris Peace Conference on views of world order based on gender, class and race? How did women, workers and colonial subjects respond to the peace conference and what was its impact on the emergence of alternative voices in international affairs? Whose voices were heard at Paris in 1919 and whose remained silent or were silenced?
  6. What political and diplomatic practices were implied in these various conceptions of international order?  To what extent did these practices shape the course of international relations after 1919?  Did the intellectual debate and political experience of the Paris Peace Conference play a role in shaping a future generation of leaders (such as Jean Monnet and John Foster Dulles)?

Paper proposals

The Conference organizers aim to ensure the conference provides a global perspective on the Paris Peace Conference. We are therefore particularly keen to receive proposals from scholars working on topics pertaining to the non-western world. The organisers anticipate securing limited financial resources to support delegates’ participation in the conference.

The conference languages will be English and French

Regardless of language, all proposals will receive serious consideration.

The deadline for paper proposals is:  1 June 2018

Please send your proposal (abstract in English or French of no more than 500 words) and short CV to Axel Dröber:

Conference Steering Group:

Laurence Badel (Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Eckart Conze (Philipps-Universität Marburg)

Jean-Michel Guieu (Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Norman Ingram (Concordia University)

Peter Jackson (University of Glasgow)

Stefan Martens (Deutsches Historisches Institut, Paris)

Matthias Schulz (Université de Genève)

William Mulligan (University College Dublin)

Comité scientifique:

Andrew Barros (Université du Québec à Montréal)

Carl Bouchard (Université de Montréal)

Eric Bussière (LABEX EHNE)

Michael Clinton (Gwynedd Mercy University)

Olivier Compagnon (Paris III – Sorbonne Nouvelle)

Beatrice de Graaf (Utrecht)

Vincent Dujardin (Université catholique de Louvain)

Olivier Forcade (Université de Paris -Sorbonne)

Erik Goldstein (University of Boston)

Talbot Imlay (Université Laval)

Stanislas Jeannesson (Université de Nantes)

John Keiger (University of Cambridge)

William Keylor  (University of Boston)

Antoine Marès (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Holger Nehring (University of Stirling)

Jennifer Siegel (The Ohio State University)

Glenda Sluga (University of Sydney)

Georges-Henri Soutou (Institut de France)

Christian Tams (University of Glasgow)

Hugues Tertrais (Commission of History of international relations-ICHS)  

Martin Thomas (University of Exeter)

Antonio Varsori  (University of Padua)

Hirotaka Watanabe (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies)

Xu Guoqi  (University of Hong Kong)